John Chapter 1 verse 2 Holy Bible

ASV John 1:2

The same was in the beginning with God.
read chapter 1 in ASV

BBE John 1:2

This Word was from the first in relation with God.
read chapter 1 in BBE

DARBY John 1:2

*He* was in the beginning with God.
read chapter 1 in DARBY

KJV John 1:2

The same was in the beginning with God.
read chapter 1 in KJV

WBT John 1:2


read chapter 1 in WBT

WEB John 1:2

The same was in the beginning with God.
read chapter 1 in WEB

YLT John 1:2

this one was in the beginning with God;
read chapter 1 in YLT

John 1 : 2 Bible Verse Songs

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 2. - The same Logos whom the writer has just affirmed to have been God himself, was, though it might seem at first reading to be incompatible with the first or third clause of the first verse, nevertheless in the beginning with God - "in the beginning," and therefore, as we have seen, eternally in relation with God. The previous statements are thus stringently enforced, and, notwithstanding their tendency to diverge, are once more bound into a new, unified, and emphatic utterance. Thus the αὐτός of the following sentences is charged with the sublime fulness of meaning which is involved in the three utterances of ver. 1. The first clause (1) declared that the Logos preceded the origination of all things, was the eternal ground of the world; the second (2) asserted his unique personality, so that he stands over against the eternal God, in mutual communion with the Absolute and Eternal One; the third clause (3) maintains further that the Logos was not a second God, nor merely Divine (Θεῖος) or God-like, nor is he described as proceeding out of or from God (ἐκ Θεοῦ or ἀπὸ Θεοῦ), nor is he to be called ὁ Θεός, "the God absolute," as opposed to all his manifestations; but the Logos is said to be Θεός, i.e. "God" - God in his nature and being. This second verse reasserts the eternal relation of such a personality "with God," and prepares the way for the statements of the following verses. The unity of the Logos and Theos might easily be supposed to reduce the distinction between them to subjective relations. The second verse emphasizes the objective validity of the relation.

Ellicott's Commentary

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(2) The same was.--This is a summary in one clause of the three assertions made in the first verse.The same, that is, the Word who was God, existed before any act of creation, and in that existence was a person distinct from God. Yet it is more than a re-statement. We have arrived at the thought that the Word was one in nature with God. From this higher point of view, the steps below us are more clearly seen. The Word was God; the eternal pre-existence and personality are included in the thought.