John Chapter 8 verse 57 Holy Bible

ASV John 8:57

The Jews therefore said unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
read chapter 8 in ASV

BBE John 8:57

Then the Jews said to him, You are not fifty years old; have you seen Abraham?
read chapter 8 in BBE

DARBY John 8:57

The Jews therefore said to him, Thou hast not yet fifty years, and hast thou seen Abraham?
read chapter 8 in DARBY

KJV John 8:57

Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
read chapter 8 in KJV

WBT John 8:57


read chapter 8 in WBT

WEB John 8:57

The Jews therefore said to him, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?"
read chapter 8 in WEB

YLT John 8:57

The Jews, therefore, said unto him, `Thou art not yet fifty years old, and Abraham hast thou seen?'
read chapter 8 in YLT

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 57. - The Jews, therefore, said unto him - once more misinterpreting his words, and giving a materialistic tone to his Divine hint - Thou hast not yet fifty years - "Thou art not fifty years old" - and hast thou seen Abraham? Christ did not say that be had seen Abraham, but that Abraham had seen and rejoiced in his day. The Jews chose to regard the language of Jesus as adding another immense improbability, if not falsehood, to his previous claims, viz. that he had actually lived to twice the age of Methuselah already. The "fifty years old" may have been simply used in round numbers for the age of man's prime and completed life (Numbers 4:3, 39; Numbers 8:24). There may have been, even if our Lord was only thirty-three years of age at the time of his Passion, that which apparently added to his years. A tradition is mentioned (Irenaeus, 100, 2, 22. 5) of the more advanced age of Jesus which the Ephesian presbyters preserved, and which Irenaeus regards as between the forty-fifth and fiftieth years. Ernest de Bunsen vainly finds a reference to Christ's age (John 2:20) in the forty-six years of the temple; but it is strange that, with the exception of the statement in Luke 3:23, there is nothing in the extraneous chronological data, e.g. the death of Herod and recall of Pontius Pilate, which need positively compress our Lord's life within fifty years (Westcott). And Keim has made the suggestion that our Lord did carry on his ministry for a much longer period than is commonly supposed. It is far more probable, however, that the Jews were using an expression for the term of a completed life, and were supplying no chronological data whatever.

Ellicott's Commentary

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(57) Thou art not yet fifty years old.--There is no reason to doubt that we have the correct reading here, though some, from Chrysostom downward, have sought to avoid what seemed to them a difficulty, by substituting "forty" for "fifty." Others, and among them were the "Elders who in Asia conferred with John, the Lord's disciple," have held that our Lord was between forty and fifty years of age at the time of his public ministry. We know this from the testimony of Irenaeus, who appears to have this very passage in his mind, for he says, "As the gospel and all the Elders witness" (Lib. 2 chap. 22 ? 5; Oxford Translation, p. 160). But "fifty years" was the period of full manhood (Numbers 4:3; Numbers 4:39; Numbers 8:24). This is expressed in round numbers, and there is no care to be more exact in comparison with the two thousand years which had passed since the close of Abraham's earthly life. The thought is, "Thou art still a young man, and hast thou seen Abraham who died twenty centuries ago?"